The removal of misconception about supporting the Anti-natalism from justification for dismissal

جواز ِعزل سے جنم مخالف نظریہ کی تائید کی بابت اشتباہ کا ازالہ

Abstract

Anti-Natalism is gaining popularity on the Internet and in the Western world. Over the past ten years, many Western thinkers have published books and online research articles on the subject. Anti-Natalism is a theory that views worldly life as worse and death is given priority over life. The basic premise of this theory is that the world is a bad place and that human beings are harmed instead of benefiting by being created, therefore, non-existence is better than existence. In Islam, the term عزل"dismissal" has been introduced for the termination of the birth process, and many jurists seem to be convinced of the legitimacy of dismissal. Justifying dismissal raises the question of whether "anti-natalism" and dismissal are two sides of the same coin or is there a difference between them? Does "dismissal" support anti-natalism? Our research concludes that there is a difference between the justification of dismissal in Islam and the anti-natalism of Western thinkers. And justification for dismissal does not in any way strengthen the anti-natalism.